Bollypedia

‘Prague’ has originality in its inspired storytelling, a few picturesque shots and a fresh use of imagery. The film fractures in the second half, stumbling on the de-linked portrait it attempts to paint. If we talk about performances, then, for Chandan the actor, he embraces all the confusion, complexities, insecurities and insanity of his character. In some sequences where his madness overtakes his better judgement, he allows his character to take over. We can see him floating in the tides of whimsy. Prague takes us into the depths of despair. Not all, or even some of the events in the film make sense when judged against conventional populist elements. This film dares to court the dark side of the human mind. is a highly inconsistent film that shifts disturbingly between realities and delusions briskly. The characters which you could view as realistically flawed emerge as sketchy caricatures that are definitely passion-less. The director’s work grips well in the first half, but repetitive ideas and predictable flow dissipates the energy that the film’s promising look had flaunted! I had a bit too many reservations on the film that eventually left me confused due to its muddled screenplay and hence I wouldn’t really recommend this one to people. All in all, Director Ashish Shukla’s novel direction is visible but with a screenplay that wavering, this was the best that could be managed out perhaps!

Anuradha
Prague
Rate This :